OWASP Top 10 2025: The Simple Guide to Web Security
Imagine the internet as a huge digital city. Some neighborhoods are safe, but others? crawling with cybercriminals. Every day, hackers look for weak spots—stealing passwords, breaking into websites, and causing digital chaos.
Enter OWASP, the ultimate security guide that helps websites stay protected from cyber threats. Let’s break it down in a way that actually makes sense!
What is OWASP?
OWASP (Open Web Application Security Project) is a non-profit organization that studies how hackers attack websites. Every few years, they publish the Top 10 biggest security risks, so developers and businesses can fix them before hackers strike.
If you own a website, work in tech, or just use the internet, this matters to you.
Myth vs. Fact: Are You at Risk?
🚫 Myth: "Hackers only attack big companies."
✅ Fact: 43% of cyberattacks target small businesses—because they often lack security.
🚫 Myth: "My website doesn’t store sensitive data, so I’m safe."
✅ Fact: Hackers can still use your site to spread malware or launch attacks on others.
🚫 Myth: "A strong password is enough."
✅ Fact: If your website has security flaws, even the best password won’t protect you.
***This is a simplified version for better understanding***
🔐 Unauthorized Access – Hackers sneaking into places they shouldn’t.
🔑 Weak Data Protection – Poor security exposes private information.
⚡ Bad Code Injection – Websites running dangerous hacker commands.
🚧 No Security Planning – Security should be built-in from day one.
🔩 Weak Configurations – Default settings can leave security holes.
📅 Outdated Software – Old, unpatched tools make sites vulnerable.
🔓 Weak Login Security – Easy-to-guess passwords and no 2FA? Big mistake.
🐍 Tampered Software Updates – Fake updates that contain malware.
👀 No Attack Monitoring – If you’re not watching, hackers can roam freely.
📢 Accidental Data Leaks – Websites unknowingly exposing private info.
***Orginal version***
- A01:2021-Broken Access Control moves up from the fifth position to the category with the most serious web application security risk; the contributed data indicates that on average, 3.81% of applications tested had one or more Common Weakness Enumerations (CWEs) with more than 318k occurrences of CWEs in this risk category. The 34 CWEs mapped to Broken Access Control had more occurrences in applications than any other category.
- A02:2021-Cryptographic Failures shifts up one position to #2, previously known as A3:2017-Sensitive Data Exposure, which was broad symptom rather than a root cause. The renewed name focuses on failures related to cryptography as it has been implicitly before. This category often leads to sensitive data exposure or system compromise.
- A03:2021-Injection slides down to the third position. 94% of the applications were tested for some form of injection with a max incidence rate of 19%, an average incidence rate of 3.37%, and the 33 CWEs mapped into this category have the second most occurrences in applications with 274k occurrences. Cross-site Scripting is now part of this category in this edition.
- A04:2021-Insecure Design is a new category for 2021, with a focus on risks related to design flaws. If we genuinely want to "move left" as an industry, we need more threat modeling, secure design patterns and principles, and reference architectures. An insecure design cannot be fixed by a perfect implementation as by definition, needed security controls were never created to defend against specific attacks.
- A05:2021-Security Misconfiguration moves up from #6 in the previous edition; 90% of applications were tested for some form of misconfiguration, with an average incidence rate of 4.5%, and over 208k occurrences of CWEs mapped to this risk category. With more shifts into highly configurable software, it's not surprising to see this category move up. The former category for A4:2017-XML External Entities (XXE) is now part of this risk category.
- A06:2021-Vulnerable and Outdated Components was previously titled Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities and is #2 in the Top 10 community survey, but also had enough data to make the Top 10 via data analysis. This category moves up from #9 in 2017 and is a known issue that we struggle to test and assess risk. It is the only category not to have any Common Vulnerability and Exposures (CVEs) mapped to the included CWEs, so a default exploit and impact weights of 5.0 are factored into their scores.
- A07:2021-Identification and Authentication Failures was previously Broken Authentication and is sliding down from the second position, and now includes CWEs that are more related to identification failures. This category is still an integral part of the Top 10, but the increased availability of standardized frameworks seems to be helping.
- A08:2021-Software and Data Integrity Failures is a new category for 2021, focusing on making assumptions related to software updates, critical data, and CI/CD pipelines without verifying integrity. One of the highest weighted impacts from Common Vulnerability and Exposures/Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVE/CVSS) data mapped to the 10 CWEs in this category. A8:2017-Insecure Deserialization is now a part of this larger category.
- A09:2021-Security Logging and Monitoring Failures was previously A10:2017-Insufficient Logging & Monitoring and is added from the Top 10 community survey (#3), moving up from #10 previously. This category is expanded to include more types of failures, is challenging to test for, and isn't well represented in the CVE/CVSS data. However, failures in this category can directly impact visibility, incident alerting, and forensics.
- A10:2021-Server-Side Request Forgery is added from the Top 10 community survey (#1). The data shows a relatively low incidence rate with above average testing coverage, along with above-average ratings for Exploit and Impact potential. This category represents the scenario where the security community members are telling us this is important, even though it's not illustrated in the data at this time.
🚫 Myth: "Hackers only attack big companies."
✅ Fact: 43% of cyberattacks target small businesses—because they often lack security.
🚫 Myth: "My website doesn’t store sensitive data, so I’m safe."
✅ Fact: Hackers can still use your site to spread malware or launch attacks on others.
🚫 Myth: "A strong password is enough."
✅ Fact: If your website has security flaws, even the best password won’t protect you.
***This is a simplified version for better understanding***
🔐 Unauthorized Access – Hackers sneaking into places they shouldn’t.
🔑 Weak Data Protection – Poor security exposes private information.
⚡ Bad Code Injection – Websites running dangerous hacker commands.
🚧 No Security Planning – Security should be built-in from day one.
🔩 Weak Configurations – Default settings can leave security holes.
📅 Outdated Software – Old, unpatched tools make sites vulnerable.
🔓 Weak Login Security – Easy-to-guess passwords and no 2FA? Big mistake.
🐍 Tampered Software Updates – Fake updates that contain malware.
👀 No Attack Monitoring – If you’re not watching, hackers can roam freely.
📢 Accidental Data Leaks – Websites unknowingly exposing private info.
***Orginal version***
- A01:2021-Broken Access Control moves up from the fifth position to the category with the most serious web application security risk; the contributed data indicates that on average, 3.81% of applications tested had one or more Common Weakness Enumerations (CWEs) with more than 318k occurrences of CWEs in this risk category. The 34 CWEs mapped to Broken Access Control had more occurrences in applications than any other category.
- A02:2021-Cryptographic Failures shifts up one position to #2, previously known as A3:2017-Sensitive Data Exposure, which was broad symptom rather than a root cause. The renewed name focuses on failures related to cryptography as it has been implicitly before. This category often leads to sensitive data exposure or system compromise.
- A03:2021-Injection slides down to the third position. 94% of the applications were tested for some form of injection with a max incidence rate of 19%, an average incidence rate of 3.37%, and the 33 CWEs mapped into this category have the second most occurrences in applications with 274k occurrences. Cross-site Scripting is now part of this category in this edition.
- A04:2021-Insecure Design is a new category for 2021, with a focus on risks related to design flaws. If we genuinely want to "move left" as an industry, we need more threat modeling, secure design patterns and principles, and reference architectures. An insecure design cannot be fixed by a perfect implementation as by definition, needed security controls were never created to defend against specific attacks.
- A05:2021-Security Misconfiguration moves up from #6 in the previous edition; 90% of applications were tested for some form of misconfiguration, with an average incidence rate of 4.5%, and over 208k occurrences of CWEs mapped to this risk category. With more shifts into highly configurable software, it's not surprising to see this category move up. The former category for A4:2017-XML External Entities (XXE) is now part of this risk category.
- A06:2021-Vulnerable and Outdated Components was previously titled Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities and is #2 in the Top 10 community survey, but also had enough data to make the Top 10 via data analysis. This category moves up from #9 in 2017 and is a known issue that we struggle to test and assess risk. It is the only category not to have any Common Vulnerability and Exposures (CVEs) mapped to the included CWEs, so a default exploit and impact weights of 5.0 are factored into their scores.
- A07:2021-Identification and Authentication Failures was previously Broken Authentication and is sliding down from the second position, and now includes CWEs that are more related to identification failures. This category is still an integral part of the Top 10, but the increased availability of standardized frameworks seems to be helping.
- A08:2021-Software and Data Integrity Failures is a new category for 2021, focusing on making assumptions related to software updates, critical data, and CI/CD pipelines without verifying integrity. One of the highest weighted impacts from Common Vulnerability and Exposures/Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVE/CVSS) data mapped to the 10 CWEs in this category. A8:2017-Insecure Deserialization is now a part of this larger category.
- A09:2021-Security Logging and Monitoring Failures was previously A10:2017-Insufficient Logging & Monitoring and is added from the Top 10 community survey (#3), moving up from #10 previously. This category is expanded to include more types of failures, is challenging to test for, and isn't well represented in the CVE/CVSS data. However, failures in this category can directly impact visibility, incident alerting, and forensics.
- A10:2021-Server-Side Request Forgery is added from the Top 10 community survey (#1). The data shows a relatively low incidence rate with above average testing coverage, along with above-average ratings for Exploit and Impact potential. This category represents the scenario where the security community members are telling us this is important, even though it's not illustrated in the data at this time.
Why This Matters?
If websites don’t protect against these risks, hackers can steal data, take over accounts, or shut down services. The OWASP Top 10 helps developers, businesses, and even everyday users understand these threats and how to stay safe online.
If websites don’t protect against these risks, hackers can steal data, take over accounts, or shut down services. The OWASP Top 10 helps developers, businesses, and even everyday users understand these threats and how to stay safe online.
How to Stay Safe (Quick Fixes)
Conclusion
Think of OWASP Top 10 2025 as your digital security checklist. Whether you’re a developer, business owner, or everyday internet user, knowing these risks keeps hackers out and your data safe.
Think of OWASP Top 10 2025 as your digital security checklist. Whether you’re a developer, business owner, or everyday internet user, knowing these risks keeps hackers out and your data safe.
Comments
Post a Comment